We wanted to create a final prototype with plastic sides so the community in Nicaragua could potentially create a water distiller kit themselves, as it would be nice to have several different options that the community could choose from.
With this goal in mind, we measured all the pieces and cut them. We first tried cutting the plastic pieces using a plastic cutter knife, however, it was extremely difficult. We ending up using a machine in the machine shop, which wasn't great, as this wouldn't happen in Nicaragua. However, Amy said that the people there were very handy and could probably figure something out. With that in mind, we went ahead with our plan.
We took two of our plastic pieces and used a hand drill to drill a hole in each of them: One for letting in water, one for letting out water. We originally thought of using plastic water bottles for the nozzles of the water distiller, however, we found they were much weaker and could potentially let out water. Therefore, we decided to use soda bottles.
We then cut a plastic Pepsi bottle for the nozzle and the cap, took off the cap and the small plastic ring, and put the nozzle piece inside the drilled hole, and screwed the cap back on. This would be used for letting out water.
For letting in water, we sliced a plastic coke bottle diagonally so that the cap would be at an angle and it would be easier to pour in water.
We then glued everything together minus the glass top. We first used tape to fasten the cut plastic pieces together and then glued the pieces from the inside using a silicone adhesive (as this would be the glue they would have in Nicaragua). We also glued both soda bottle pieces and waited a day to let the glue dry.
After the glued dried, we took the tape off and tested if the container would hold water. It was indeed leaking, and we had to fill in all the holes we saw and wait a bit longer to test again. A second run-through showed that it was still leaking; there were places in the corners of the container and the water was leaking from the "letting out" water bottle cap as well. We had to keep gluing to make sure we stopped all the leaks.
We came to the conclusion that silicone adhesive was not the best material from stopping water flow, as even though we put massive amounts of glue, we couldn't stop all the leaks. Also, the adhesive was extremely messing and not very aesthetically pleasing at all. We ended up scraping much of the silicone off and using hot glue to seal the holes, which eventually worked.
Our final product:
Sunday, November 22, 2015
Friday, November 20, 2015
Further testing
After creating our initial prototype, we wanted to test different materials for the top of the water distiller, as well as different angles. We decided to test glass and acrylic for the tops, and made two new prototypes:
These prototypes have a few key differences. We decided to not cut out an angle, and instead, tilt the box to create the slope. This approach has both advantages and drawbacks, the advantage, being that it made the distillers incredibly easy to build. The drawback, however, is that the angle makes it so that the surface area of the water becomes smaller, and therefore, water is slower to evaporate. Our former prototype allowed the water to be flat, so since the water was spread out and thinner, it evaporated quite well. However, since it was such a pain to cut, we decided to try this approach.
We put in 400 mL in each box and then sealed the tops with tape. The boxes were left under the solar lights for 12 hours, and then the distilled water was measured. The undistilled water was measured as well, in order to calculate how much water was lost in this whole process. This process was repeated twice for both boxes, each time with a different angle. The angles were created by propping the boxes with wooden blocks of the same size. The blocks had a height of .75 inches. The first time, we propped the boxes with two blocks, the second time with 4 blocks... and got these results.
In the first run through with two blocks, we immediately noticed some disadvantages with the plastic. It appeared that the plastic curved with the heat, and even through the top was securely taped down with lots of tape, too much water was escaping through the edges of the curves. It also pointed to the fact that the plastic could potentially degrade very easily in intense heat. In the end, it didn't produce any distilled water, and 50 mL of water was lost, as 400 mL was originally put in. The glass was noticeably heavier, and did not have any apparent curving. 35 mL of distilled water was produced, while 15 mL of water was lost in the process.
In the second run through with the four blocks, we made sure to tape the plastic extremely throughly in order prevent water loss. 22 mL of distilled water was produced, while 13 mL was lost. The glass, on the other hand, produced 37 mL of distilled water and 13 mL of water was lost as well.
For our testing, we had use tape/remove the tape to easily take out and measure the amount of water produced, as we did not create the mechanisms for filling and taking out the water yet. However, in our final prototype, will will glue the tops down, and this will hopefully prevent more water loss. Looking at the second run-through, it appears that glass is far more effective than plastic, as it had the same amount of water-loss, yet glass produced more distilled water. Adding more height/angle to the boxes did not appear to make a significant difference. Given that we only had two run-throughs, we may need to test more to come to more concrete conclusions. However, judging by previous water distillers that other have made, we concluded that glass does appear to be the best material for the top, and we will proceed with that.
| Two new prototypes with different materials for tops. Left is acrylic and right is glass. |
These prototypes have a few key differences. We decided to not cut out an angle, and instead, tilt the box to create the slope. This approach has both advantages and drawbacks, the advantage, being that it made the distillers incredibly easy to build. The drawback, however, is that the angle makes it so that the surface area of the water becomes smaller, and therefore, water is slower to evaporate. Our former prototype allowed the water to be flat, so since the water was spread out and thinner, it evaporated quite well. However, since it was such a pain to cut, we decided to try this approach.
We put in 400 mL in each box and then sealed the tops with tape. The boxes were left under the solar lights for 12 hours, and then the distilled water was measured. The undistilled water was measured as well, in order to calculate how much water was lost in this whole process. This process was repeated twice for both boxes, each time with a different angle. The angles were created by propping the boxes with wooden blocks of the same size. The blocks had a height of .75 inches. The first time, we propped the boxes with two blocks, the second time with 4 blocks... and got these results.
| Our results from testing |
In the first run through with two blocks, we immediately noticed some disadvantages with the plastic. It appeared that the plastic curved with the heat, and even through the top was securely taped down with lots of tape, too much water was escaping through the edges of the curves. It also pointed to the fact that the plastic could potentially degrade very easily in intense heat. In the end, it didn't produce any distilled water, and 50 mL of water was lost, as 400 mL was originally put in. The glass was noticeably heavier, and did not have any apparent curving. 35 mL of distilled water was produced, while 15 mL of water was lost in the process.
In the second run through with the four blocks, we made sure to tape the plastic extremely throughly in order prevent water loss. 22 mL of distilled water was produced, while 13 mL was lost. The glass, on the other hand, produced 37 mL of distilled water and 13 mL of water was lost as well.
| Significant amount of water loss coming from the sides of the glass top box |
For our testing, we had use tape/remove the tape to easily take out and measure the amount of water produced, as we did not create the mechanisms for filling and taking out the water yet. However, in our final prototype, will will glue the tops down, and this will hopefully prevent more water loss. Looking at the second run-through, it appears that glass is far more effective than plastic, as it had the same amount of water-loss, yet glass produced more distilled water. Adding more height/angle to the boxes did not appear to make a significant difference. Given that we only had two run-throughs, we may need to test more to come to more concrete conclusions. However, judging by previous water distillers that other have made, we concluded that glass does appear to be the best material for the top, and we will proceed with that.
Creating our First Prototype
We first created a cardboard prototype (rectangular base, triangular
sides with slope) for our Solar water distiller. We were inspired by the
designs of currently used water distiller that we saw on various websites.
| Our Solar Distiller paper prototype |
Next we tested two different versions:
Round glass bowl: We placed a low cup in a deep glass salad
bowl. We then put 400 ml in the bowl. We sealed the bowl with a clear plastic shrink
wrap and placed a small item on top at the center of the shrink wrap to make
the center of the wrap lower than the edge. To mimic the heat of the sun, we
placed the bowl under a heat lamp that emitted UV light. We hypothesized that
the heat from the lamp would penetrate through the clear wrap and warm the
water. The water would then start to evaporate. When it touched the shrink wrap,
condensation would occur; upon touching the shrink wrap, the water droplets would
flow from the edges of the bowl toward the lower center of the bowl and drop
into the cup. We checked the process every 24 hours.
Results: no water accumulated in the cup after the first two
days. By the third day there was less than 10ml in the cup.
A rectangular clear plastic base: Based on our initial paper
prototype, we used a clear 11” x 6” plastic box (bought from The Container
Store). We cut it with a slope so that one side was lower than the other. We then
cut a rectangular piece and used it as a divider to form two compartments. The
larger one for was for the undistilled water, while the smaller compartment to
collect the distilled water. We filled the large compartment with tap water,
covered the whole container with clear plastic shrink wrap, and placed it under
the heat lamp.
This design ended
up working. After three days we accumulated 97 ml of distilled water.
| We tested the designs for 3 days |
After three
days about 93 ml of distilled water accumulated in the small compartment
|
Because water accumulated at the edge of the shrink wrap, we
lost some water in the process.
We decided to use a permanent material top for our next
design, and we needed to test which material would be the best. This will be
discussed in the upcoming post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)